Skip to content

SteamDB App Identity and Records

Quick Answer

ArcheAge Chronicles uses Steam App 3218230, while the demo uses App 5280930. Use those identifiers to find the relevant SteamDB record.

ArcheAge Chronicles uses Steam App 3218230, while the demo uses App 5280930. Use those identifiers to find the relevant SteamDB record. Entries for App 304030 and App 1147660 belong to older ArcheAge products and should not be treated as the new game's record.

SteamDB is useful for inspecting information associated with a Steam application, but a record's existence is not proof that you can currently play it. On November 2, 2026, the official main-game Steam snapshot still marks Early Access as coming soon, with November 3 shown as the planned release date. Keep that availability state separate from the existence of database entries, files, or past demo activity.

Start with identity rather than a matching name

Searching the franchise name can return several applications with similar words, artwork, or community discussions. The full game, a demo, and older releases can all appear relevant at a glance. The application number is the simplest way to keep them apart.

RecordApp IDWhat it identifies
Main game3218230ArcheAge Chronicles
Demo5280930The dedicated Chronicles demo application
Original game304030ArcheAge, a different product
Unchained1147660ArcheAge: Unchained, another product

Confirm the number before using any field or graph from a record. A technically accurate record for the wrong application still gives the wrong answer to your question. This is especially easy to miss when an article abbreviates the franchise name to ArcheAge.

The official main-game store identity is XLGAMES as developer and publisher in the current Steam snapshot. If another application's title or developer information does not match the intended record, stop and recheck the identity before interpreting its statistics or update history.

ArcheAge Chronicles SteamDB main record with App ID 3218230 and XLGAMES fields

This is the main-game record; the demo has a different application ID.

Keep the main game and demo records separate

The demo is a separate application, rather than a temporary label pasted over every main-game statistic. Activity associated with Demo 5280930 belongs to that demo application. It does not automatically become the player history, purchase count, or release evidence for App 3218230.

That separation explains why two records can show different activity patterns without contradicting one another. One may reflect a public preview event while the other describes a product that is still approaching paid Early Access. They measure different things because access happened through different applications.

The Steam Next Fest demo has officially ended. Its record can remain useful for historical identification after the event closes. A surviving database entry does not extend the playable window, and a downloadable remnant in a library does not establish that its servers still accept access.

If your purpose is interpreting demo participation, use the demo record and label it as such. If your purpose is identifying the paid game, use the main application. Avoid combining them under a single unlabeled history simply because they share most of the title.

A release-date field needs an availability check

A date displayed in application or store information can be a planned date. The current official main-game snapshot makes that explicit: it contains a November 3, 2026 release date and a coming-soon state at the same time. The date is therefore not proof that the release has already happened.

Read date and state together. A future date, a coming-soon label, an available purchase package, and a playable server opening are related pieces of a launch, but they are not interchangeable. Pre-purchasing a product can happen before the playable opening.

The planned Early Access opening is November 3 at 3 PM Pacific Time. That is a specific PC release milestone. It does not establish a console release time, and it should not be copied into a PlayStation or Xbox availability claim merely because the same game has console storefront listings.

When comparing records, also distinguish a historical event date from the current release plan. The September network test and the October Next Fest demo had their own windows. A date associated with one of those events should not be relabeled as the full game's public release.

Store packages and application identity answer different questions

The application identifies the game. A purchase offer describes what a store transaction is offering at a particular time and region. You need the relevant offer to understand what you are buying; an application number alone cannot establish every edition, bonus, or regional price.

In the November 2 US Steam snapshot, the base-game price is $29.99 and the product is not free to play. The page describes a pre-order package that includes the base game and a Dawn Pioneer Outfit Chest. Those are details of the current offer, rather than permanent properties that can safely be assumed for every future package.

A database record is therefore a useful starting point for identity, while the actual checkout offer remains the place to confirm the purchase relevant to your account. Do not infer a console entitlement, a free upgrade, or a license on another storefront from a Steam application record.

Similarly, a list of related identifiers does not explain every relationship by itself. A separate item can be a demo or another associated product without granting the same access. Use the item's actual name and description rather than deciding what it is from its position next to the main game.

Do not turn update activity into an unannounced feature

Information changing in an application record can show that something in the record changed. It does not, by itself, identify the design purpose, prove a public feature is ready, or establish that a patch has reached every player. A timestamp is useful chronology, not a complete changelog.

For gameplay changes, prefer a specific released-version explanation. The pre-launch producer letter, for example, identifies Wavesword balance changes, party-channel improvements, and a first-launch shader-compilation screen. Those concrete descriptions are more informative than guessing at the meaning of a generic record update.

Future features also need their own status. Female Warrior is planned for the first update in December, and Gladius is planned as Warrior's third weapon. Seeing a changed record should not be used to announce that either feature has secretly become available ahead of its stated public plan.

The practical rule is to use database activity as a reason to look for an explanation, rather than as a replacement for one. That keeps useful discovery separate from unsupported interpretation.

Player graphs are activity records rather than sales records

If you open a chart from a SteamDB entry, confirm the application again before reading its graph. A demo chart reflects demo activity, and the main-game chart reflects its own measured Steam application. The original ArcheAge chart remains about the original game.

Concurrent-player values refer to simultaneous activity. They are not unique daily players, owners, total accounts, purchases, or revenue. Comparing a current value with an all-time peak can describe the difference between those measurements, but it cannot identify individual people who permanently left.

Event boundaries matter as well. An ended demo can produce a sharp change in activity because access conditions changed. That does not directly measure how many people intend to buy the paid release. Keep the application, metric, timeframe, and event phase attached to any number you discuss.

No verified live count is supplied here. If a chart cannot be read reliably, the correct result is to leave the number unreported. A remembered peak or an old search-result snippet should not be promoted into a current statistic.

Keep an identity note when comparing several records

If you are opening several tabs, write down the application name and ID together before comparing their contents. A note that says only ArcheAge is ambiguous; a note that says Chronicles main game, App 3218230, preserves the identity you actually checked. Do the same for Demo 5280930 when reviewing the preview event.

Keep the observation date beside any changing field you record. This does not make an old observation current, but it prevents the observation from losing its original context when shared later. For a chart value, also keep the metric name and time window. For a price, keep the storefront region and offer identity. These small labels make the comparison reproducible and reveal mismatches before they turn into a claim about another product.

Use the record to answer a specific question

For identifying the game, confirm App 3218230 and the Chronicles title. For identifying the demo, confirm App 5280930 and keep its event history separate. For deciding whether you can play now, check the current official availability state and the relevant event or release announcement.

For buying the game, inspect the offer available to your own account. For understanding a feature change, look for a specific version explanation. For reading activity, use the correct graph and measurement. Each task uses a different part of the information instead of asking one record field to answer everything.

This reading order is particularly useful around launch, when previews, pre-orders, demo statistics, and new release announcements overlap. Start with identity, then ask what kind of evidence you actually need. It avoids the common errors of treating a demo peak as main-game population, a planned date as a completed launch, or a changed database entry as a confirmed new gameplay feature.